đź“š View in PSE Archive
Summary
Phil explains why tariffs lead to war, drawing on Australia’s 1975-1992 tariff removal as a model of productivity gains (though gains went to land prices, not workers). He highlights BMW deploying AI humanoid robots in Leipzig specifically to reduce labor/manufacturing costs — but notes these productivity gains ultimately flow into rent, not worker wages. Trump’s belief that reshoring manufacturing will create jobs misunderstands that returning factories will use robots. The fundamental problem is that all productivity gains get absorbed as land rent.
Key Claims
- Tariffs always lead to war — historical record is consistent. — confidence: high
- Australia removed tariffs progressively 1975-1992; led to major productivity gains and has never had a recession since. — confidence: high
- Productivity gains from tariff removal went into land prices, not workers. — confidence: high
- BMW deploying AI humanoid robots in Leipzig to reduce labor/manufacturing costs (Feb 28 FT). — confidence: high
- Reshored US manufacturing will mostly use robots, not labor. — confidence: high
- All productivity gains — including robotics — ultimately flow into rent. — confidence: high (author’s thesis)
- Benefits of US trade/globalization past decades flowed into higher land prices, widening inequality. — confidence: high
Predictions / Forecasts
- Tariff war leads to actual war — already beginning in 2026. — status: confirmed (Iran war started Feb 28)
- Tariffs will not bring back meaningful manufacturing jobs (robots will replace workers). — status: pending
Concepts Referenced
Notable Quotes
“Tariffs do not create benefits, except for the person or business that has a monopoly position.”
“Companies like BMW can introduce robotics and productivity improvements to bring down manufacturing costs, but they can’t introduce anything that reduces land rent costs.”
“Worse is coming.”